DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
4845°
Run this model
Offers / Ads
DeepSeek | 1,048,576 token context | $0.22/M input, $0.65/M output. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is an experimental vision-enabled version of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Opens in new tab from DeepSeek, adding image understanding while matching the base model on text capabilities including agents, reasoning, and world knowledge. It is a sparse mixture-of-experts model with 13B active parameters out of 284B total. It is suited for document and chart understanding, visual question answering, and multimodal agent workflows that interleave text and images.
Guides for this model

Best local LLM by use case (October 2026): the right open model for every job
How much VRAM do I actually need for local AI?
Open weights vs open source vs API-only: what you are actually allowed to do
What is a GGUF file? Quantized models explained (Q4, Q8, fp8, NF4)
Captain's notes
Notes from 2026-10-13
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is DeepSeek's first multimodal entry in the V4 Flash family, grafting image understanding onto an already capable sparse MoE architecture with 13B active parameters out of 284B total. It holds its own on text agent tasks while adding meaningful gains on multimodal agent benchmarks, chart understanding and visual QA. If you need a fast, cheap model that can reason over both images and text, this is worth a serious look.
Known for
- Multimodal agent workflows that mix images and text in the same pipeline
- Document and chart understanding at a price well below frontier vision models
- Text agent performance roughly matching its non-vision sibling DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- Over one million token context window
- Open weights with a minimal PyTorch inference reference and vLLM support
Watch out for
- Experimental label means behaviour may shift; not a production-stable release.
- 284B total parameters make local deployment demanding — you will need serious hardware.
- Licence terms are not detailed in the maker's published materials; check before commercial use.
Prompts to try
Chart data extraction
Attach a bar or line chart image. Extract all data series, label each axis, list the values as a markdown table, and note any trend or anomaly worth flagging. Be precise about numbers shown; do not estimate values that are not clearly readable.
Multimodal agent plan
I am building an agent that receives a screenshot of a web dashboard and must decide the next action to take. Given the attached screenshot, identify every interactive element visible, infer the current state of the application, and propose a prioritised list of next actions with a one-sentence rationale for each.
Document reasoning task
Attach a scanned invoice or contract page. Identify the parties involved, extract all monetary figures and their associated line items, flag any clause or figure that looks unusual or inconsistent, and summarise the document in three bullet points.
Compare with
- DeepSeek Flash LatestAPI-only model1,048,576 token context · $0.04/M input, $0.68/M output
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashOpen-weights model1,048,576 token context · $0.04/M input, $0.68/M output
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Open-weights model1,048,576 token context · $0.01/M input, $1.28/M output
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Open-weights model1,048,576 token context · $0.09/M input, $0.18/M output
More text models from deepseek
Questions people ask
- Are the weights open and can I run this locally?
- Yes, the weights are published on Hugging Face at deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp. The repository includes a minimal PyTorch inference implementation and vLLM support, though the 284B total parameter count means you will need substantial GPU memory to run it yourself.
- What does it cost and what is the context window?
- Via API it is priced at $0.22 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens, with a context window of 1,048,576 tokens.
- How does this differ from DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
- This model adds visual modules and continued multimodal training on top of V4 Flash 0731, gaining image understanding while keeping text agent performance roughly comparable to the base model.
Captain's verdictA rare combination of open weights, million-token context, vision and sub-dollar-per-million pricing — experimental status is the only real caveat.
Model card on Hugging Face
Captain writes these notes from the model's own description and model card. Prices and context sizes are the provider's at the time of writing and can change.
Ranking badge
Updated Oct 22, 2026
Made this model? Show this badge on your page.
Paste it into your Hugging Face card or Civitai description.
How this score adds up
This model has no popularity data from any source yet, so it carries a stand-in number below 7,000° that keeps the lists complete. It never ranks above a model with data. The breakdown appears here as soon as a source reports it.
Glossary: the terms used here
- Heat score
- One number for how much a model is used and wanted right now, from 0° to 9,999°. Every list on this site that says hottest is sorted by it and nothing else.
- Floor
- The 7,000° every model with real data starts from. The scale runs from 0° to 9,999°; the part below the floor is reserved for stand-ins (models without data), so that a model with data always ranks above one without. The floor is the same for everyone and decides nothing; the degrees above it are the measurement.
- Download-equivalents
- Everything the score treats as a download, added up: downloads themselves, each torrent seeder as 1,000, each AI Horde image and each run on a generation site as one.
- Log scale
- Counting by tens, not by ones: going from 1,000 to 10,000 downloads adds the same degrees as going from 10,000 to 100,000. It keeps giants from crowding out everything else.
- Likes
- Thumbs up and likes from every source, worth half a download each on the log scale.
- Adoption rate
- How many downloads a day a model gets right now, from the difference between two readings of a source. A quarter of the weight of the download term.
- Measured and estimated
- Measured means two readings of a source exist and the difference is real. Estimated means only today's total is known and the past is spread over the model's life; the site says which one it is showing.
- Seeder
- Someone who keeps a copy of the weights online for others to download over a torrent, or a hosted mirror doing the same. Each one counts as 1,000 downloads.
- AI Horde
- A volunteer network that generates images for free on donated computers. The number of images it has made with a model is public, and each counts as one download.
- Generation sites
- Sites that host their own copies of a model and let people generate with it, such as PixAI, SeaArt and Yodayo. Their downloads count like Civitai's and each generation run as one download.
- OpenRouter tokens
- A text model served through an API, such as Claude or GPT, has no weights to download, so its usage is measured in tokens: the pieces of text it read and wrote through OpenRouter, a gateway many apps use, over the last 30 days. Every 10,000,000 tokens count as one download. Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), CC BY 4.0.
- Full model (checkpoint)
- The weights themselves, the file that generates on its own. It gets a bonus because add-ons depend on it.
- LoRA and embedding
- Small add-on files that steer someone else's weights toward a style, a character or a concept. They cannot run alone.
- Family and weights
- The base a model is built on, such as SD 1.5, SDXL, Flux or Wan. Every model inherits the release date of its family's weights.
- Age
- Degrees taken off for how long ago the family's weights came out: 150° a year, up to 750°. It keeps old downloads that had years to pile up from freezing the top of the list.
- Family boost
- A small, bounded nudge for LoRAs of a family this site is pushing forward right now, always listed in the breakdown.
- Stand-in score
- A stable number below the floor given to a model no source reports on yet, so lists stay complete. It never ranks above a model with data.
- New! (grace period)
- A model less than 7 days old shows New! instead of a score and holds no place in the rankings. Its score is computed from day one, but a model one day old grows faster than anything, so without the wait the week's #1 would always be whatever came out yesterday rather than what held up for a week.
- Trend
- How a model's growth over a period compares with the typical model's growth over the same period. Faster than typical reads as a rise, slower as a fall.
- Typical model
- The middle of the catalog: half the models with a figure grew faster over the period, half slower.
