Skin Detail Slider (Krea2 + ZIT)

Skin Detail Slider Krea2: Unlike the Z-image version that worked best on the refiner pass alone, this works best at moderate values on all the generation passes you use in your workflow. I had the same problem with showcasing this as i did with the Z-image version. A skin detailer should not be a huge flashy change that "pop" on sample images, it should change the "feel" of the image. Sidenote, this is not the same as my at all. This will not fix the 3D/CGI look that some times happend that my Realistic slider was made to fix. Recommended range: 0.5 to 3.5 Z-Image: This is in my opinion, my best LoRA to date, but it has been the hardest to showcase. I gave up making impressive sample images for this one. A skin detailer that's doing its job is invisible, you don't see it, you feel it. People stop looking like plastic and start looking alive, and the image itself doesn't change. Don't trust my samples. Take a portrait or any image you've already generated, run it with and without and judge for yourself. Use it on the first pass, the refiner pass, or both. First pass only = more natural expression in the face. Refiner only = pure skin texture on top of your existing image. Both = fully alive, from expression down to the pores. Recommended range: 0.5 to 4.0 Recommended range on refiner/detailer: 2.0 to 8.0 Moody and other checkpoints that makes faces a bit smooth can take higher values One last thing to keep in mind, if you only use 1 pass when generating images, dont go to hard, or your pretty girls can turn, you know, a little to real. XD All my work is 100% free. The only thing that really matters to me is people leaving a review, good or bad. I will NEVER remove or block anyone for leaving a bad review, so don't be afraid to give me criticism. I'm stating this because when a creator blocks someone for leaving a bad review, that person can no longer see any of the creator's models, essentially muting their critics. This is something I'm highly critical of, and I believe it's a fundamental quality problem on this site.